6061-T6 Aluminum vs. 6063-T6 Aluminum
6061-T6 and 6063-T6 are both part of the 6000 series of aluminum alloys, primarily composed of aluminum, magnesium, and silicon. However, they have different properties and are used in different applications.
6061-T6 and 6063-T6 are commonly used in various industries, including aerospace, construction, and manufacturing. While they share similarities, there are key differences in their composition and performance.
| Property | 6061-T6 Aluminum | 6063-T6 Aluminum |
| Strength | Stronger, making it suitable for high-stress applications | Lower strength, suitable for applications with less stress |
| Extrusion Capability | Less suited for intricate extrusions | Better suited for extrusion, with smoother finishes and easier machinability |
| Applications | High-stress and structural components (aircraft, marine, automotive) | Architectural and decorative applications (window frames, railings) |
| Machinability | More difficult to machine due to higher strength | Easier to machine due to lower strength |
6061-T6 Aluminum
- Composition: 6061 aluminum is an alloy primarily made of aluminum, magnesium, and silicon. It is one of the most commonly used alloys for structural and aerospace applications.
- Strength: 6061-T6 is known for its high strength and is considered one of the strongest heat-treated alloys.
- Properties: It has excellent corrosion resistance, good workability, and is highly weldable. It also performs well in both anodized and painted finishes.
- Applications: It is commonly used in aerospace (aircraft structures, fuselage, and wings), marine applications, automotive parts, and structural components for buildings and bridges.
- Machinability: 6061 is more difficult to machine compared to 6063 due to its higher strength, but it is still considered highly machinable.
6063-T6 Aluminum
- Composition: 6063 is also an aluminum alloy that contains magnesium and silicon but has a slightly different balance compared to 6061, which makes it more suited for applications requiring excellent surface finish and extrusion.
- Strength: While 6063-T6 has a lower tensile strength compared to 6061-T6, it still has good strength for many applications.
- Properties: Known for excellent corrosion resistance and a smoother finish, 6063 is particularly preferred in architectural applications. It is also easier to extrude and form into complex shapes compared to 6061.
- Applications: It's widely used in architectural and decorative applications such as window frames, door frames, railings, and in some structural and general-purpose extrusions.
- Machinability: 6063 is generally easier to machine than 6061 due to its lower strength, making it a better choice for applications requiring detailed, high-quality finishes.
How to Choose Between 6061-T6 and 6063-T6 Aluminum
- If you need a material with high strength and durability, choose 6061-T6.
- If you need a material that is easy to process, aesthetically pleasing, and with lower strength requirements, choose 6063-T6.
| Properties | 6061-T6 | 6063-T6 |
| Main Composition | Magnesium (0.8% - 1.2%), Silicon (0.4% - 0.8%) | Silicon (0.2% - 0.6%), Magnesium (0.45% - 0.9%) |
| Strength | Higher tensile strength and yield strength | Lower tensile strength and yield strength |
| Weldability | Good | Good |
| Extrudability | Good | Excellent |
| Corrosion Resistance | Good | Good, but may be better under certain conditions |
| Appearance | Functionality is prioritized | Aesthetics are prioritized |
| Common Applications | Structural components (frames, chassis), aerospace, automotive, marine parts | Architectural applications (window frames, door frames), decorative applications, radiators |
| Cost | Generally higher | Generally lower |
6061-T6 Aluminum vs. 6063-T6 Aluminum Alloy Composition
| Element | 6061-T6 Aluminum | 6063-T6 Aluminum |
| Aluminum (Al), % | 95.9 to 98.6 | 97.5 to 99.4 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0.040 to 0.35 | 0 to 0.1 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0.15 to 0.4 | 0 to 0.1 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.7 | 0 to 0.35 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0.8 to 1.2 | 0.45 to 0.9 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.15 | 0 to 0.1 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0.4 to 0.8 | 0.2 to 0.6 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 to 0.15 | 0 to 0.1 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 to 0.25 | 0 to 0.1 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | 0 to 0.15 |
6061-T6 Aluminum vs. 6063-T6 Aluminum Mechanical Properties
| Property | 6061-T6 Aluminum | 6063-T6 Aluminum |
| Brinell Hardness | 93 | 73 |
| Elastic Modulus (Tensile), x 10⁶ psi | 10 | 9.9 |
| Elongation at Break (%) | 10 | 11 |
| Fatigue Strength, x 10³ psi | 14 | 10 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, x 10⁶ psi | 3.8 | 3.7 |
| Shear Strength, x 10³ psi | 30 | 22 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), x 10³ psi | 45 | 35 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), x 10³ psi | 39 | 30 |
6061-T6 Aluminum vs. 6063-T6 Aluminum Thermal Properties
| Property | 6061-T6 Aluminum | 6063-T6 Aluminum |
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 400 | 400 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °F | 330 | 320 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °F | 1190 | 1210 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °F | 1080 | 1140 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, BTU/lb-°F | 0.21 | 0.22 |
| Thermal Conductivity, BTU/h-ft-°F | 97 | 120 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 24 | 23 |
6061-T6 Aluminum vs. 6063-T6 Aluminum Electrical Properties
| Property | 6061-T6 Aluminum | 6063-T6 Aluminum |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 43 | 53 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 140 | 180 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Property | 6061-T6 Aluminum | 6063-T6 Aluminum |
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| Calomel Potential, mV | -740 | -740 |
| Density, lb/ft³ | 170 | 170 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO₂/kg material | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Embodied Energy, x 10³ BTU/lb | 66 | 66 |
| Embodied Water, gal/lb | 140 | 140 |
Common Calculations
| Property | 6061-T6 Aluminum | 6063-T6 Aluminum |
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m³ | 30 | 25 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m³ | 520 | 320 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 50 | 50 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 31 | 25 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 37 | 32 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm²/s | 68 | 82 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 14 | 11 |

