2618 Aluminum vs. 6061 Aluminum
2618 Aluminum is suitable for professional applications that require high strength and high-temperature performance, while 6061 Aluminum performs better in terms of versatility, corrosion resistance, and formability, making it a more widely used choice.
2618 Aluminum and 6061 Aluminum Comparison Table
| Property | 2618 Aluminum | 6061 Aluminum |
| Strength | Excellent performance in high-stress and high-temperature applications, suitable for extreme conditions. | Moderate strength, suitable for general purposes, but not for ultra-high-stress environments. |
| Versatility | Primarily used in high-strength specialized fields. | Versatile, widely used in various engineering fields, particularly in construction and manufacturing. |
| Corrosion Resistance | Requires additional treatment, such as coating or anodizing, in similar environments. | Excellent corrosion resistance, suitable for outdoor and marine applications. |
| Application Background | Suitable for aerospace and automotive performance parts, the first choice for high-strength and high-temperature applications. | Suitable for structural parts and components in everyday environments, such as frames and pipes. |
2618 Aluminum and 6061 Aluminum Strength Comparison
| Property | 2618 Aluminum | 6061 Aluminum |
| Tensile Strength | Significantly higher, suitable for applications with high strength requirements. | Moderate strength, suitable for general structural applications. |
| Yield Strength | Higher yield strength, capable of working under higher mechanical loads. | Lower yield strength, but meets the needs of general applications. |
2618 Aluminum and 6061 Aluminum Ductility Comparison
| Property | 2618 Aluminum | 6061 Aluminum |
| Ductility | Provides a good balance of strength and ductility, but with a lower elongation at fracture. | Higher elongation at fracture, more easily formed and bent. |
2618 Aluminum and 6061 Aluminum Fatigue Resistance Comparison
| Property | 2618 Aluminum | 6061 Aluminum |
| Fatigue Resistance | Performs better under high fatigue stress, suitable for applications with high cyclic loads. | Performs well under medium fatigue stress, suitable for general applications. |
2618 Aluminum and 6061 Aluminum Shear Strength Comparison
| Property | 2618 Aluminum | 6061 Aluminum |
| Shear Strength | Higher shear strength, suitable for applications with heavy lateral or torsional loads. | Medium shear strength, suitable for low to medium strength applications. |
2618 Aluminum and 6061 Aluminum Corrosion Resistance Comparison
| Property | 2618 Aluminum | 6061 Aluminum |
| Corrosion Resistance | Lower corrosion resistance, requires coating or anodizing to improve performance. | Excellent corrosion resistance, suitable for outdoor and marine environments, no additional treatment required. |
2618 Aluminum and 6061 Aluminum Application Comparison
Applications of 2618 Aluminum
| Field | Specific Applications |
| Aerospace | Jet engine components, high-temperature structural parts, aerospace fasteners, etc. |
| Automotive Industry | High-performance racing engine components (e.g., pistons, crankshafts, etc.). |
| Industrial Uses | High-temperature pipes and structural components. |
Applications of 6061 Aluminum
| Field | Specific Applications |
| Construction | Structural beams, scaffolding, load-bearing supports, etc. |
| Transportation | Frames and components for automobiles, ships, and trains. |
| Manufacturing | Pipes, tubes, and general profiles. |
| Marine Applications | Hulls and other components exposed to saltwater. |
2618 Aluminum vs. 6061 Aluminum Mechanical Properties
| Property | 2618 Aluminum | 6061 Aluminum |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus (GPa) | 71 | 69 |
| Elongation at Break (%) | 5.8 | 3.4 to 20 |
| Fatigue Strength (MPa) | 110 | 58 to 110 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus (GPa) | 27 | 26 |
| Shear Strength (MPa) | 260 | 84 to 210 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS) (MPa) | 420 | 130 to 410 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof) (MPa) | 350 | 76 to 370 |
2618 Aluminum vs. 6061 Aluminum Thermal Properties
| Property | 2618 Aluminum | 6061 Aluminum |
| Latent Heat of Fusion (J/g) | 390 | 400 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical (°C) | 210 | 170 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus) (°C) | 640 | 650 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus) (°C) | 550 | 580 |
| Specific Heat Capacity (J/kg-K) | 880 | 900 |
| Thermal Conductivity (W/m-K) | 160 | 170 |
| Thermal Expansion (µm/m-K) | 22 | 24 |
2618 Aluminum vs. 6061 Aluminum Electrical Properties
| Property | 2618 Aluminum | 6061 Aluminum |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume (% IACS) | 37 | 43 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (% IACS) | 110 | 140 |
2618 Aluminum vs. 6061 Aluminum Alloy Composition (% by weight)
| Element | 2618 Aluminum | 6061 Aluminum |
| Aluminum (Al) | 92.4 to 94.9 | 95.9 to 98.6 |
| Chromium (Cr) | 0 | 0.040 to 0.35 |
| Copper (Cu) | 1.9 to 2.7 | 0.15 to 0.4 |
| Iron (Fe) | 0.9 to 1.3 | 0 to 0.7 |
| Magnesium (Mg) | 1.3 to 1.8 | 0.8 to 1.2 |
| Manganese (Mn) | 0 | 0 to 0.15 |
| Nickel (Ni) | 0.9 to 1.2 | 0 |
| Silicon (Si) | 0.1 to 0.25 | 0.4 to 0.8 |
| Titanium (Ti) | 0.040 to 0.1 | 0 to 0.15 |
| Zinc (Zn) | 0 to 0.1 | 0 to 0.25 |
| Residuals | 0 | 0 to 0.15 |
